Ponniyin Selvan Varalaatru Peravai

But the same Krishna was quiet when Karna was insulted as Suthra
Putra inspite of Knowing the truth.

Drona was deemed to be a great brahman but he took the fingers off
Ekaleva after refusing to teach him because he was not a Kshathriya
and when he learnt the tricks by watching....this was to prevent any
competetion for arjuna his favorite pupil.

The learned Vidhura was never respected as a brahman becuse he was
born to a sudra...he is even termed suthra puthra.....

Kripacharya and Drona both refused karna permission to challenge
arjuna because he was a sudra if the social strata was based on
present birth and actions and there was no one as a ble as karna to
be called Kshatriya...

So all these examples are from Vyasa's mahabharat and though he
says something in the voice of Krishna as Bhagvat Gita..its not what
he has written in the book....

Lord Krishna is not a nagarjuna or rajinikanth
to fight evil wherever he sees it.Mahabharatha happened at the near
of the dawn of kaliyuga and these were the indicators that in Kali
the world will twist the vedas and interpret in a wrongway to suit
its vested interests.Mahabharatha shows many of its characters doing
unvedic things like gambling your wife,removing the saree of
draupathi before the whole population etc.This was done by none
other than yudishtra,the man who is hailed as the exemplar of
rectitude.These are signs of nearing of kali.Mahabharatha shows many
characters making mistakes.Are these mistakes permitted in vedas?
No.Its failure in practicing theory.

Krishna knew all this will happen.He willed
for all this to happen.He was god.He wrote a script and participated
in it as a participant.He must have been laughing at all this.

who were the people who insulted vidhura?It
was only duriyodana&co.When Krishna comes to hasthinapura he stays
in viduras house and hails him as "mahathma vithura".Vyasa in many
places in mahabharatha calls vithura as "mahathma".In mahabharatha
many characters are criticized.Even krishna is criticized by
shisubala,duriyodana and even pandavas.Does it mean that
mahabharatha was against krishna?No.When you are envious of somebody
you criticize him at times even unfairly and even use racist
terms.That was done by the characters of mahabharatha.Where does
mahabharatha hail such racist comments?It shows all such criticized
charatcers in good light.It hails ekalaiva and shows how arjuns
jealousy gave him a very bad name.Its a record of history,thats all.

"But Drona's son aswathama was given all the liberties of a brahman
by birth??!!!""

Aswathama learnt vedas from his father and had all
qualities of a bhramin.But the moment he fought in mahabharatha war
he and his father drona lost all quaities of being called as
bhramins.YOu can see in yudha kanda in mahabharatha that after
killing drona thristathyumna did not do any parikaram for
bhrammahathi dosham.When you kill a bhramin you get bhrammahathi
dosham.But it did not affect thristathyumna since drona lost the
status of a bhramin.

we can also see that when aswathama kills all the sons
of draupathi at the end of war pandavas go to kill him.Krishna asks
them to kill aswathama.In vedas it is written that it is a sin to
kill a bhramana.But why did krishna ask pandavas to kill aswathama?
It is since he lost the status of being a bhramin.But they spare him
in the end only since he was their guru's son.