Thanks to Pradeep and REACH
  • * In a forgotten land *

    PRADEEP CHAKRAVARTHY

    History recounts Pullalur in Tamil Nadu as the venue of battles and
    bloodshed. Pradeep Chakravarthy, on a visit to the village, tries to unravel
    some mysteries.



    * At Pullalur:Remnants of a bygone era. *

    Every time we think history, we think battles and wars. So many years of
    history created from battles have done nothing to convince humankind of the
    futility of such loss of blood. Such thoughts were far from our head as
    Anusha and I were driving down the Chennai–Kanchipuram highway on a pleasant
    December morning.

    Passing Kanchipuram on the left, we drove towards Arakkonam. After the
    Tirumalpuram Railway station we got into quieter roads flanked by rice
    fields and bordered by palm trees. The road finally and languorously reached
    Pullalur. Everything about Pullalur is low key and slow. Certainly nothing
    there has anything to do with speed and war. The cows refuse to give way,
    the people think for a few minutes before slowly pointing out directions and
    the temple priest won't let us go till we have some refreshments. By the
    time he has taken two steps to get to his bike we are already in our car but
    that doesn't help as we amble along to the Vishnu temple and then to the
    Shiva temple.
    *

    Stone images
    *

    The Shiva temple has no gates and boundary walls either. The Vishnu temple
    is in better shape. There is an incongruous Rama shrine added on. “The
    village had an old Vaishnavite who worshipped a Rama bronze image and before
    he passed away, he gave the images to the temple and consecrated these stone
    images as well,” we were told. There was more of Rama to come, but this was
    the first clue.

    Unless you have an interest for inscriptions, these two temples will bore
    you to death, there are some lovely bronzes and a few stucco images but the
    walls guard their secrets well. The town seems to have had, apart from the
    two temples now, also those for Durga Bhadrakali and an important one for
    Rama. Inscriptions that record gifts to the Rama temple call the town Tiru
    Ayodhi and the temple as dedicated to Sri Raghava. Parantaka I's queen Seyya
    Bhuvana Sundaramudayar donated a lamp and lands in circa 941AD. Subsequent
    Chola Kings have added to the Rama temple and gifts include tracts of land
    being made tax-free for wise men who recited the Ramayana and the Bharatam.

    The temple also has a rare inscription from Rajamahendra who ruled between
    1060-63. Significantly most of the ten inscriptions in the Shiva temple and
    the Vishnu temple refer to the Rama temple. The Epigraphy report also
    mentioned a field called Devaradiyal Manyam, a land that was gifted to a
    lady by the Kanchi Ekambaraswara temple in the 17th century. No one had
    heard of this land though.

    Our search ended in a small brick temple in the middle of thick shrubs.
    Stucco images from the tower told us it was a Vishnu temple, possibly
    remodelled in the Vijayanagar or later times.
    *

    Touched up
    *

    The interior was empty, the roof missing and many of the bricks stolen. For
    a forgotten temple, the whitewashed interiors were an oddity, why did
    someone choose to lavish care on the interior of the temple that had no idol
    and a gaping hole in the roof? The REACH Foundation had unearthed traces of
    paintings, part of a forehead and a crown and a handsome torso. Could these
    be Chola images? This temple itself dedicated to Rama? The inscriptions
    point in that direction but the painting is so damaged by the whitewash it's
    difficult to date it though the style is reminiscent of Lepakshi. If they
    are indeed Chola, then they become a rare example since we know of Chola
    paintings only in Thanjavur.

    We sat by the roadside on a pillar (which we later discovered had an amorous
    theme to its side!) and waited for a very large contingent of goats to cross
    the narrow road. “Why was Pullalur so obsessed with the Ramayana?” The
    village seemed to have a knack for attracting battles. In the Pallava times,
    Pullalur must have seen much bloodshed when the forces of Pulakesi (610–642
    ACE) and Mahendra Varma Pallava (571–630ACE) clashed with each other in the
    mid 7th century. Then again, in the Chola period, the nearby village of
    Takkolam was the sight of a bloody battle and again in 1781, the village was
    the battlefield for the British against the French and Hyder Ali. It is said
    that some palm trees still carry bullet holes of the third battle.
    *

    Early records
    *

    For a village of this size, there is one more mystery the village holds and
    will probably never reveal. Who won the Pullalur battle? The Kasakudi copper
    plates that record the gift of the Kodukoli village by the king to a set of
    Brahmins, mentions that among the illustrious ancestors of Nandivarman, who
    ordered the grant was Mahendravarman “who annihilated his chief enemies at
    Pullalura”. We can easily conclude that the Chalukyas did indeed lose if it
    wasn't for an inscription in the Meguti temple in Badami. The inscription is
    dated in a curious style – “3735 years since Mahabharata war, Saka era 556”
    ie. 634-5 CE with the Mahabharata war dated to BC 3138.

    The inscription adds that Pulakesi II, “With his six fold forces, the
    hereditary troops and the rest, who raised spotless chaowries, hundreds of
    flags, umbrellas, and darkness, and who churned the enemy elated with the
    sentiments of heroism and energy, he caused the splendour of the lord of the
    Pallavas, who had opposed the rise of his power, to be obscured by the dust
    of his army, and to vanish behind the walls of Kanchipuram.”


    * Damaged:Difficult to date it. *

    So who won the Pullalur war? Pulakesi II or Mahendra Varma Pallava? The
    truth is buried in the sands of time though both kings seem to have conceded
    loss of their territories to the other. Pulakesi could not conquer
    Mahendra's capital Kanchi and Mahendra retained his capital but lost his
    northern territories.

    Pullalur has no traces of witnessing three (and more?) battles, all of them
    very significant ones. Perhaps it guards its bloody secrets well to remind
    its visitors that wars and military conflict will continue to have little
    effect across centuries and other forms of conflict resolution are better
    off. Is someone listening to the walls of Pullalur and Badami or to the rice
    fields that were three times soaked in blood of the fallen?

    For more information, visit http://www.poetryinstone.in

    Contact the author at pradeepandanusha@gmail.com

    (Photo courtesy: REACH Foundation)

    http://www.poetryinstone.in
    “*Here the language of stone surpasses the language of man*” – Nobel
    laureate, Rabindranath Tagore

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters