How do you feel about a sequel to PS
  • Vanakkam,
    I recently read the book called "Kaveri Maindhan" by Anusha. She had
    tried to write a sequel to PS, i suppose. As a book, it was a good
    narration, but as a sequel to PS, it wouldn't satisfy the expectations
    of PS readers, i think.
    How did others felt about the same? Also, was the retrieval of
    Pandya's 'Rathna haram' and 'crown' had been really done duringthe
    period or a scope created by the author?
    Nandrigaludan,
    Amar
  • hi amar

    as a rule sequels never live up to the original - add to it the
    masters ( kalki) brilliance. regarding the crown, quoting from the
    Mahavamsam account( srilanka)

    During the reign of Dappula V (918-930), a Pandya
    king came to Ceylon to ask for Dappula's help
    against the Colas. Since the assistance was refused
    he betook himself to the Kerala country, leaving his
    diadem in Ceylon (Mahav. 53, 5ff). Under king Udaya
    II (942-950) a Cola king sent his army to Ceylon to
    fetch the Pandya crown (Mahav, 53, 40ff.) But
    although the Colas were victorious in battle and
    conquered the northern provinces, Udaya succeeded in
    escaping to Rohana with the crown and other
    treasures. The victorious Cola king was no doubt
    again Parantaka I (907-947), mentioned above, for he
    calls himself in his latest inscriptions conqueror of
    Ilam i.e, Ceylon.(1)

    A diadem (from the Greek 'diadema' from 'diadeo' to bind round, or
    fasten) was originally a white ribbon, ending in a knot and two
    strips that were placed often on the shoulders, that surrounded the
    head of the king to denote his authority.By extension, this term was
    applied later to a crown, generally with a circular shape.

    (Author’s Note: Chola inscriptions found in India by King Rajendra
    Chola indicates Pandu King
    fled to Lanka and left the diadem in Lanka. It further states that
    he brought back the diadem from
    Lanka.

    Udaya IV: (955 AD â€" 964 AD)
    After Sena, Udaya became the King.
    Chola Attack:
    During King Udaya’s time, Chola King, sent messengers demanding the
    diadem left by the Pandu
    King. King Udaya refused to send the diadem to the Chola King. Chola
    King sent a huge army and
    defeated King Udaya’s army. King Udaya fled to Rohana.

    In A.D. 981 the weak king Mahinda V ascended the
    throne of Ceylon. Since he was unable to pay them,
    tile Kerala and other mercenaries rebelled. Mahinda
    fled to Rohana, but in Northern Ceylon the
    mercenaries carried on a military dictatorship. The
    Cola king, turning the confusion in Ceylon to his own
    advantage, sent troops to tile island (Mahav. 55, 14
    ff.). The Colas advanced on Rohana, captured the king
    and the queen alive and brought them with all their
    treasures to India. This took place in the 36th year
    of Mahinda's reign, i.e. A.D. 1017,

    The victorious Cola king was Rajendra Cola I, for
    he boasts in the Tirumalai Rock inscription(2) of
    having seized the crown of the king of Ilam (on) the
    tempestuous ocean; the exceedingly fine crowns of the
    queens of that (king); the beautiful crown and the
    necklace of Indra, which the king of the South (i.e.
    the Pandya) had previously deposited with that (king
    of Ilam); the whole Ila-mandala (on) the transparent
    sea."
  • Wow Vj,

    That was really a gr8 explanation. Thanks for
    enlightening me with those facts. I'm an illiterate
    with respect to such historical facts, and could gain
    such clarifications only thru books and chats. And
    more over your guidance.

    Nandrigaludan,
    Amar
  • welcome, in todays connected world, we have access to all these. but
    imagine the herculian efforts of kalki to gather all this and
    cronicle / weave it into his immortal work...we all read ps
    visualising these events in our agakk kan and cannot aptly find
    words to describe the joy when we find these facts.

    For every great epic there is a start...the transcendental outburst
    of emotion of valmiki onseeing the hunter shooting down the kraunca
    bird led to the immortal ramayana

    The famous shloka that vAlmIki utters when he witnesses the killing
    of the krauncha bird by the hunter:

    mA niShAda pratiShThA.n tvamagamaH shAshvatI.n samAH |
    yatkrauJNchamithunAdekamavadhIH kAmamohitam.h ||
    (bAlakANDa 2.14)

    O Hunter! Since you killed one of the pair of Krauncha birds in
    love, may you also bear similar pangs...

    What inspired kalki ( possibly the culverts convicting ravidasan and
    gang!!) - would be great if we could share his notes.

    where fact ends and where kalki's fiction starts is the stroke of
    his genius....vj
  • Dear Amar
    the pandya haram and mudi were brought back by Rajendra 1....there is
    epigraphic evidence to that effect
    This is covered well in Akilans Vengaiyin Mainthan...a must read...I
    somehow felt that this can be called a sequael to PS...because VD is
    the samanthakanayakar of the Chola empire and still has the same charm
    though he is in his 60s-70s
  • Hi Sri,
    Thanks for the detail, i feel gr8 to be in the grp as
    i get to know lot of thinks that i desired, and
    unexpected things too, like the book mentioned by you.
    That will be the very next book on which i'm gonna lay
    my hands upon.
    Nandrigaludan,
    Amar

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters