I am a very recent entrant to your group and am amazed at the interest generated in PS.
Having read PS, sure all of us have some nagging doubts, which i presume very intentionally sown by Kalki...his other works SS and PK don't have this element in it.
Listing down some of the things that still baffle me,not sure if you had discussed these in your previous posts, please enlighten me if you have
1. Mandakini's love on arul Mozhi.. my inference is:
- though she is little mad, she does have her motherly instincts - Arul mozhi was the first child she touches ( when she rescues him from the river) - so this is the sole cause for her to pour her affection on him
or does she realise that she wronged her lover, by bearing the child of another and does so to appease him.
2. Which instrument killed aditya karikalan
there were three knives in the room -
manimekali's knife - but as per later discussions, we find the knife has no blood on it, plus she was taken away by ganthahamaran on aditya karikalan's instructions. so she must have come back just after the incident and inferred that it must have been her lover vanthiya thevan and tried to save his skin by taking the blame.
veera pandiyan's sword - as per kalki, aditya karikalan lay dead with this sword. quote" avan udalil veera pandiyanudaiya vaal painthuirunthathaiyum kandal" and at that time the sword was in aditya karikalan's hand and nandini was looking at periya pazhuvettaiyar's entry. So did he commit suicide. But if so, why did periya pazhuvettaiyar take the blame on himself and commit suicide. he specially also states on his death bed that he did so to clear vanthiya thevan's name...
Idumban kari's thirugu val..
This has some blood on it, but whose. Periya pazhuvettaiyar is shown as advancing towards nandhi with the drawn sword at the time aditya karikalan is already dead...further in the next scene, in the mountain cave, pariya pazhuvettaiyar is shown recovering from loos of blood. he has not regained consiousness since the killing - so how was he injured. could be he had a fight with soman sambavan and got injured in the process.
But as he emerges from the cave, he lets go of soman who are fleeing to the top of mountain throught he secret cave entrance. If indeed soman sambavan had killed Aditya Karikalan, would'nt he have made an effort to fight them or atleast accuse them.
There are only three people who could have seen what acutally happened - Soman Sambavan, Periya pazhuvettaiyar and Vanthiyathevan.
i inlude Vanthiyathevan in this list because of what follows:
3) who wielded the instrument
we can rule out Nandhini...she does not have a knife and is looking at periya pazhuvettaiyar's entry.
Periya pazhuvettaiyar ....he still had the thiruguval in his hands when Aditya karikalan is lying dead. and he is thanked by nandhini for clearing her name at the time of his death bed.
Soman sambavan They were just entering the room and peeping in when Aditya Karikalan is slain. further the attitude of Periya Pazhuvettaiyar towards them in the mountain cave is not clear.
Manimekalai No motive n cannot kill. More so that she comes forward to take the blame means she is trying to protect someone....
Aditya karikalan If it were suicide why is manimekalai taking the blame, why is periya pazhuvettayar taking the blame.
Vanthiya thevan ... He is repeatedly spared by nandhini saying he will come of use to her cause.
why did Periya Pazhuvettaiyar strangle vanthiya thevan ( to the extent that he almost chokes).....
If u go as per kalki concluding notes...its still unclear of nandhini's father..if so vt himself says he heard nandhini say veera pandiyan is her father to kundavai...was he lying.
We see that Vanthiya thevan is a shrewd man n judges that arulmozhi is a better king..so is the wish of his lady love kundavai. Arul mozhi dives into the sea to save him n recognises all his services to him...whereas aditya karikalan immdly doubts if he threw the spear at the boar or at him..
Here again we need to see the dying statement of Periya pazhuvettaiyar, he says he killed himself so that Vandiyathevan's name is cleared and he is able to serve the kingdom and also b'cause he knew of Kundavaiyar's love to vanthiya thevan.
So ....
But if you ask me the most complex character in the whole plot is Anbil anirudhar..
Having got all the inputs fm alvarkadiyan why did he not throw the plotters behind bars immdly. Possibly he knew aditya karikaalan's character n wanted the better equipped arul to ascend.
Though discussed many a times, I guess it was Kalki's ploy to keep the discussion alive forever. Whatever question you've asked could never be answered by a single individual and accepted by the others. As for me I had the same questions and I am convinced following were the reasons.
1. Mandakini comes to visit Sundara and she falls for the childs charm. 2. The weapon that killed Karikalan could be other than what you have mentioned. 3. At the post script after the 5th volume kalki states that Raja Raja, convicted Ravidasan and gang for the the murder of Karikala after the death of Nandini. This was a deliberate ploy by Kalki to confuse the reader and keep the suspense forever. I see this as an unique technique that worked very well for Kalki.