Some random thoughts on PS
  • Hi,

    I am a very recent entrant to your group and am amazed at the
    interest generated in PS.

    Having read PS, sure all of us have some nagging doubts, which i
    presume very intentionally sown by Kalki...his other works SS and PK
    don't have this element in it.

    Listing down some of the things that still baffle me,not sure if you
    had discussed these in your previous posts, please enlighten me if
    you have


    1. Mandakini's love on arul Mozhi.. my inference is:

    - though she is little mad, she does have her motherly instincts
    - Arul mozhi was the first child she touches ( when she rescues him
    from the river)
    - so this is the sole cause for her to pour her affection on him

    or does she realise that she wronged her lover, by bearing the child
    of another and does so to appease him.

    2. Which instrument killed aditya karikalan

    there were three knives in the room -

    manimekali's knife - but as per later discussions, we find the knife
    has no blood on it, plus she was taken away by ganthahamaran on
    aditya karikalan's instructions. so she must have come back just
    after the incident and inferred that it must have been her lover
    vanthiya thevan and tried to save his skin by taking the blame.

    veera pandiyan's sword - as per kalki, aditya karikalan lay dead
    with this sword. quote" avan udalil veera pandiyanudaiya vaal
    painthuirunthathaiyum kandal"
    and at that time the sword was in aditya karikalan's hand and
    nandini was looking at periya pazhuvettaiyar's entry. So did he
    commit suicide. But if so, why did periya pazhuvettaiyar take the
    blame on himself and commit suicide. he specially also states on his
    death bed that he did so to clear vanthiya thevan's name...

    Idumban kari's thirugu val..

    This has some blood on it, but whose. Periya pazhuvettaiyar is shown
    as advancing towards nandhi with the drawn sword at the time aditya
    karikalan is already dead...further in the next scene, in the
    mountain cave, pariya pazhuvettaiyar is shown recovering from loos
    of blood. he has not regained consiousness since the killing - so
    how was he injured. could be he had a fight with soman sambavan and
    got injured in the process.

    But as he emerges from the cave, he lets go of soman who are fleeing
    to the top of mountain throught he secret cave entrance. If indeed
    soman sambavan had killed Aditya Karikalan, would'nt he have made an
    effort to fight them or atleast accuse them.

    There are only three people who could have seen what acutally
    happened - Soman Sambavan, Periya pazhuvettaiyar and Vanthiyathevan.

    i inlude Vanthiyathevan in this list because of what follows:

    3) who wielded the instrument

    we can rule out Nandhini...she does not have a knife and is looking
    at periya pazhuvettaiyar's entry.

    Periya pazhuvettaiyar ....he still had the thiruguval in his hands
    when Aditya karikalan is lying dead. and he is thanked by nandhini
    for clearing her name at the time of his death bed.

    Soman sambavan
    They were just entering the room and peeping in when Aditya
    Karikalan is slain. further the attitude of Periya Pazhuvettaiyar
    towards them in the mountain cave is not clear.

    Manimekalai
    No motive n cannot kill. More so that she comes forward to take the
    blame means she is trying to protect someone....

    Aditya karikalan
    If it were suicide why is manimekalai taking the blame, why is
    periya pazhuvettayar taking the blame.

    Vanthiya thevan ...
    He is repeatedly spared by nandhini saying he will come of use to
    her cause.

    why did Periya Pazhuvettaiyar strangle vanthiya thevan ( to the
    extent that he almost chokes).....

    If u go as per kalki concluding notes...its still unclear of
    nandhini's father..if so vt himself says he heard nandhini say veera
    pandiyan is her father to kundavai...was he lying.

    We see that Vanthiya thevan is a shrewd man n judges that arulmozhi
    is a better king..so is the wish of his lady love kundavai. Arul
    mozhi dives into the sea to save him n recognises all his services
    to him...whereas aditya karikalan immdly doubts if he threw the
    spear at the boar or at him..

    Here again we need to see the dying statement of Periya
    pazhuvettaiyar, he says he killed himself so that Vandiyathevan's
    name is cleared and he is able to serve the kingdom and also b'cause
    he knew of Kundavaiyar's love to vanthiya thevan.

    So ....

    But if you ask me the most complex character in the whole plot is
    Anbil anirudhar..

    Having got all the inputs fm alvarkadiyan why did he not throw the
    plotters behind bars immdly. Possibly he knew aditya karikaalan's
    character n wanted the better equipped arul to ascend.

    vj
  • Hi,

    Though discussed many a times, I guess it was Kalki's ploy
    to keep the discussion alive forever. Whatever question you've
    asked could never be answered by a single individual and accepted
    by the others. As for me I had the same questions and I am convinced
    following were the reasons.

    1. Mandakini comes to visit Sundara and she falls for the childs charm.
    2. The weapon that killed Karikalan could be other than what you have
    mentioned.
    3. At the post script after the 5th volume kalki states that Raja Raja,
    convicted Ravidasan and gang for the the murder of Karikala after
    the death of Nandini. This was a deliberate ploy by Kalki to confuse
    the reader and keep the suspense forever. I see this as an unique
    technique that worked very well for Kalki.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Top Posters